On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19 July 2018 at 12:13, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 19 Jul 2018, at 12:09, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Ard Biesheuvel >>> <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I have only build tested it, so if you make sure that it does not break anything, please go ahead. >>> >>> I can give it a spin; what's the best way? Is CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER=y >>> sufficient? >>> >> >> You should be able to test ccm(aes) with tcrypt, yes > > Apologies, I should have been more clear here. I was replying on my > phone while attending a meeting. > > The builtin test will only kick in for chaining mode templates if they > are instantiated by something that invokes the algorithm, such as > loading tcrypt.ko with mode=37 (assuming that ccm(aes) has to be > instantiated from crypto/ccm.c and some AES cipher rather than being > provided directly by, e.g., arm64's AES-CCM driver) > > I just did the tcrypt myself, and the patch appears to be fine. Let me > know if you want me to spin the patch. Awesome, thanks for testing! I built a commit with you as the author. I'll send it out with the next batch... :) -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel