On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:45:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> Which are likely to be wrapped together? Should I take this to 512 or >> something else? > > The situation is similar to ahash. While they're using the same > skcipher interface, the underlying algorithms must all be > synchronous. In fact, if they're not then they're buggy. > > Therefore it makes no sense to use the general skcipher request > size as a threshold. You should look at synchronous skcipher > algorithms only. I might be catching on... so from this list, I should only "count" the synchronous ones as being wrappable? The skcipher list is actually pretty short: crypto/cryptd.c: crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize( crypto/cryptd.c- tfm, sizeof(struct cryptd_skcipher_request_ctx)); The above is, AIUI, unwrapped, so I only need to count sizeof(struct cryptd_skcipher_request_ctx)? These are "simple" wrappers: crypto/lrw.c: crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, crypto_skcipher_reqsize(cipher) + crypto/lrw.c- sizeof(struct rctx)); crypto/simd.c- reqsize = sizeof(struct skcipher_request); crypto/simd.c- reqsize += crypto_skcipher_reqsize(&cryptd_tfm->base); crypto/simd.c: crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, reqsize); crypto/xts.c: crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, crypto_skcipher_reqsize(child) + crypto/xts.c- sizeof(struct rctx)); But what are the "legitimate" existing crypto_skcipher_reqsize() values here? These are "complex" wrappers, with cts even adding blocksize to the mix... crypto/ctr.c- align = crypto_skcipher_alignmask(tfm); crypto/ctr.c- align &= ~(crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment() - 1); crypto/ctr.c- reqsize = align + sizeof(struct crypto_rfc3686_req_ctx) + crypto/ctr.c- crypto_skcipher_reqsize(cipher); crypto/ctr.c: crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, reqsize); crypto/cts.c- align = crypto_skcipher_alignmask(tfm); crypto/cts.c- bsize = crypto_skcipher_blocksize(cipher); crypto/cts.c- reqsize = ALIGN(sizeof(struct crypto_cts_reqctx) + crypto/cts.c- crypto_skcipher_reqsize(cipher), crypto/cts.c- crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment()) + crypto/cts.c- (align & ~(crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment() - 1)) + bsize; crypto/cts.c- crypto/cts.c: crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, reqsize); What values might be expected here? It seems the entire blocksize needs to be included as well... -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
