On Wed, 30 May 2018, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Wed, May 30 2018 at 9:21am -0400, > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 30 May 2018, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > > That is really great news, can you submit an incremental patch that > > > layers ontop of the linux-dm.git 'dm-4.18' branch? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike > > > > I've sent the current version that I have. I fixed the bugs that were > > reported here (missing DAX, dm_bufio_client_create, __branch_check__ > > long->int truncation). > > OK, but a monolithic dm-writecache.c is no longer useful to me. I can > drop Arnd's gcc warning fix (with the idea that Ingo or Steve will take > your __branch_check__ patch). Not sure what the dm_bufio_client_create > fix is... must've missed a report about that. > > ANyway, point is we're on too a different phase of dm-writecache.c's > development. I've picked it up and am trying to get it ready for the > 4.18 merge window (likely opening Sunday). Therefore it needs to be in > a git tree, and incremental changes overlayed. I cannot be rebasing at > this late stage in the 4.18 development window. > > Thanks, > Mike I downloaded dm-writecache from your git repository some times ago - but you changed a lot of useless things (i.e. reordering the fields in the structure) since that time - so, you'll have to merge the changes. You dropped the latency measuring code - why? We still would like to benchmark the driver. Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
