On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:42:29AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:02:18PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:55:12PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Remove __bdev_dax_supported and change to bdev_dax_supported that takes a > > > bdev parameter. This enables multi-device filesystems like xfs to check > > > that a dax device can work for the particular filesystem. Once that's > > > in place, actually fix all the parts of XFS where we need to be able to > > > distinguish between datadev and rtdev. > > > > > > This patch fixes the problem where we screw up the dax support checking > > > in xfs if the datadev and rtdev have different dax capabilities. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Darr...oh, I'm not allowed to do that, am I? > > > > Would you mind (re)sending this to the xfs list so that someone else can > > review it? > > > > --D > > Thanks for the review, Darrick. > > I think at one point Dave said that if you touch more than 1 filesystem with a > series you should just CC linux-fsdevel and omit the individual filesystems? > I realize that this series only touches ext2 and ext4 a little, but that's > what I opted for. > > Is that sufficient to get to the rest of the XFS developers, or would you like > a resend adding linux-xfs? For a patch by any other author I'd be fine with -fsdevel, but for this specific one (because it's written by me and I'm not yet so bofh that I review my own patches ;)) someone else from the xfs community has to review it, so yes I'd like it to be sent to linux-xfs, please. (And it's ok to note in the resend that this is the same as the -fsdevel series, but posted here to attract the attention of the other xfs developers.) --D -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
