On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 16:57 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > To indicate that the default licence is LGPL-2.0, > since there are still a lot of files without a licence header. > > Result: > multipath-tools/ > └── LICENSE.default -> LICENSES/LGPL-2.0 License.default is better than COPYING, which, as you said yourself, normally refers to a GPL-type license. But I'm unsure if this really clarifies matters. If adding my lenghty review document to the tree is out of the question, a note in the README might be more helpful than this link: License ======= The multipath-tools source code is covered by several different licenses. Refer to the individual source files for details. Source files which do not have a license header are shipped under LGPL-2.0 (see LICENSES/LGPL-2.0). Regards Martin -- Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107 SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
