[PATCH v5 04/22] multipath -u -i: respect entries in WWIDs file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Previously, if find_multipaths was set, devices listed in the WWIDs file
weren't classified as multipath members by "multipath -u -i" unless they also
met the "find_multipaths" criteria (at least two paths, or existing map with
this WWID). Now we classify all paths in the WWIDs file as multipath members, too.

The rationale for this patch is to match the logic that multipathd applies
by default (i.e. without "-n").

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
---
 multipath/main.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/multipath/main.c b/multipath/main.c
index d26c7444..ba837710 100644
--- a/multipath/main.c
+++ b/multipath/main.c
@@ -437,16 +437,19 @@ configure (struct config *conf, enum mpath_cmds cmd,
 		 * set, you need to actually check if there are two available
 		 * paths to determine if this path should be multipathed. To
 		 * do this, we put off the check until after discovering all
-		 * the paths */
-		if (cmd == CMD_VALID_PATH &&
-		    (!conf->find_multipaths || !conf->ignore_wwids)) {
-			if (conf->ignore_wwids ||
+		 * the paths.
+		 * Paths listed in the wwids file are always considered valid.
+		 */
+		if (cmd == CMD_VALID_PATH) {
+			if ((!conf->find_multipaths && conf->ignore_wwids) ||
 			    check_wwids_file(refwwid, 0) == 0)
 				r = 0;
-
-			printf("%s %s a valid multipath device path\n",
-			       devpath, r == 0 ? "is" : "is not");
-			goto out;
+			if (r == 0 ||
+			    !conf->find_multipaths || !conf->ignore_wwids) {
+				printf("%s %s a valid multipath device path\n",
+				       devpath, r == 0 ? "is" : "is not");
+				goto out;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.16.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux