On 4/9/18 5:54 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The resulting min/max and friends would have been trivial to test, but >> clearly they weren't. > > Well, the min/max macros themselves actually were tested in user space by me. > > It was the interaction with the unrelated "min_not_zero()" that wasn't ;) > > It's easy in hind-sight to say "that's not at all unrelated", but > within the context of doing min/max, it was. I guess we should just be thankful that it didn't cause bigger issues than an oops. -- Jens Axboe -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
