On 4/9/18 4:38 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That's bad, for sure, but my worry was bigger than an oops or crash, >> we could have had corruption due to this. >> >> The resulting min/max and friends would have been trivial to test, but >> clearly they weren't. > > Yeah, that was bad luck and my fault: I tested min(), max(), min_t(), It's only bad luck if it was tested :-) > and max_t(). My assumption was that since the others were built from > them, they'd be fine. Not true in this shadow variable case, though. > :( We could do something like this, which would have caught it: Might not hurt to do. -- Jens Axboe -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
