Can we drop 'hardware_handler "1 alua"'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hwtable.c has multiple entries that set 'hardware_handler "1 alua"'
explicitly. But the kernel has been auto-attaching the ALUA hwhandler
to devices that support it since 4.3, the only prerequisite being that
scsi_dh_alua is present at device probing time (kernel commits
d95dbff2, d6a32b98). "retain_attached_hwhandler" is also hard-wired
since 4.3. Thus if the above prerequisite is met, there's no point in
setting 'hardware_handler "1 alua"'.

We've recently seen problems with the explicit setting of the alua
hwhandler in the hwtable; if we do this and the device fails ALUA for
whatever reason, setting up the multipath map fails entirely.

Therefore we have reasons to try and remove 'hardware_handler "1 alua"'
from the hwtable. But it could cause regressions in some cases, e.g.
for distributions that don't force-load scsi_dh_alua before device
probing, or for kernels older than 4.3.

Opinions, please.

Martin

-- 
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux