[dm-thin] problem about __shadow_block function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all:
When I read __shadow_block  function, I found a problem as follows:
After called __shadow_block function, if the orig block is allocated to another and rewriten by another context, Meanwhile action mentioned above are committed in the same transaction, and then power loss happens before write superblock to metadata device. If the orig block is device_details_root of thin_disk_super_block, we can not find any device in thin-pool.
Is it possible?
Sincerely monty

monty_pavel@xxxxxxxx
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux