On Fri, Mar 23 2018 at 10:47am -0400, Denis Semakin <d.semakin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >I'd feel safer about having targets opt-in with setting (a new) > >ti->num_secure_erase_bios. > May be add a new field "bool secure_erase_supported:1" in dm_target structure instead? > And set up it "true" in constructor for linear targets. No, that type of change is for a DM target to support a feature even if the underlying device doesn't. As my previous email elaborated, ti->num_secure_erase_bios is the right way forward. Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
