On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Have a look at include/linux/mempool.h. > > That's not what mempool is for. mempool is a cache of elements that were > allocated from slab in the first place. (OK, technically, you don't have > to use slab as the allocator, but since there is no allocator that solves > this problem, mempool doesn't solve the problem either!) You can put the page allocator in there instead of a slab allocator. > > But still the increased page order will get you into trouble with > > fragmentation when the system runs for a long time. That is the reason we > > try to limit the allocation sizes coming from the slab allocator. > > Right; he has a fallback already (vmalloc). So ... let's just add the > interface to allow slab caches to have their order tuned by users who > really know what they're doing? Ok thats trivial. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
