libmultipath's prio routines can deal with pp->priority == PRIO_UNDEF
just fine. PRIO_UNDEF is just a very low priority. So there's
no reason to reject setting up a multipath map because paths have
undefined priority.
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
---
libmultipath/configure.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/configure.c b/libmultipath/configure.c
index fa6e21cb31af..bb3d8771592d 100644
--- a/libmultipath/configure.c
+++ b/libmultipath/configure.c
@@ -993,9 +993,6 @@ int coalesce_paths (struct vectors * vecs, vector newmp, char * refwwid,
continue;
}
- if (pp1->priority == PRIO_UNDEF)
- mpp->action = ACT_REJECT;
-
if (!mpp->paths) {
condlog(0, "%s: skip coalesce (no paths)", mpp->alias);
remove_map(mpp, vecs, 0);
@@ -1021,8 +1018,6 @@ int coalesce_paths (struct vectors * vecs, vector newmp, char * refwwid,
mpp->size);
mpp->action = ACT_REJECT;
}
- if (pp2->priority == PRIO_UNDEF)
- mpp->action = ACT_REJECT;
}
verify_paths(mpp, vecs);
--
2.16.1
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
