On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 23:15 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 21:35 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > This change looks more complicated to me than necessary. Have you > > considered > > to pass an empty signal set as the fourth ppoll() argument? > > An empty set would mean that no signal is blocked during ppoll(). > Therefore e.g. SIGALRM would terminate multipathd if it arrives > during the ppoll (no handler set, and default action is "Term"). Have you considered to only block SIGALRM while ppoll() is in progress? Thanks, Bart. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
