On Thu, Feb 22 2018 at 10:56am -0500,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> gcc-6.3 and earlier show a new warning after a seemingly unrelated change
> to the arm64 PAGE_KERNEL definition:
>
> In file included from drivers/md/dm-bufio.c:14:0:
> drivers/md/dm-bufio.c: In function 'alloc_buffer':
> include/linux/sched/mm.h:182:56: warning: 'noio_flag' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> current->flags = (current->flags & ~PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO) | flags;
> ^
>
> The same warning happened earlier on linux-3.18 for MIPS and I did a
> workaround for that, but now it's come back.
>
> gcc-7 and newer are apparently smart enough to figure this out, and
> other architectures don't show it, so the best I could come up with is
> to rework the caller slightly in a way that makes it obvious enough to
> all arm64 compilers what is happening here.
>
> Fixes: 41acec624087 ("arm64: kpti: Make use of nG dependent on arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()")
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9692829/
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> index 414c9af54ded..e7ad6fc6a5ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> @@ -413,13 +413,13 @@ static void *alloc_buffer_data(struct dm_bufio_client *c, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * as if GFP_NOIO was specified.
> */
>
> - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY) {
> noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> -
> - ptr = __vmalloc(c->block_size, gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> + ptr = __vmalloc(c->block_size, gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL);
> memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag);
> + } else {
> + ptr = __vmalloc(c->block_size, gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL);
> + }
>
> return ptr;
> }
Mikulas already sent a fix for this:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211631/
But I like yours a bit better, though I'll likely move the declaration
of 'noio_flag' temporary inside the conditional.
Anyway, I'll get this fixed up shortly, thanks.
Mike
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
