Re: [PATCH 5/7] Fix set_no_path_retry() regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ben,

On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 16:49 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> commit 0f850db7fceb6b2bf4968f3831efd250c17c6138 "multipathd: clean up
> set_no_path_retry" has a bug in it. It made set_no_path_retry
> never reset mpp->retry_ticks, even if the device was in recovery
> mode,
> and there were valid paths. This meant that adding new paths didn't
> remove a device from recovery mode, and queueing could get disabled,
> even while there were valid paths. This patch fixes that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  libmultipath/structs_vec.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libmultipath/structs_vec.c b/libmultipath/structs_vec.c
> index fbab61f..0de2221 100644
> --- a/libmultipath/structs_vec.c
> +++ b/libmultipath/structs_vec.c
> @@ -343,9 +343,10 @@ static void set_no_path_retry(struct multipath
> *mpp)
>  			dm_queue_if_no_path(mpp->alias, 1);
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		if (mpp->nr_active > 0)
> +		if (mpp->nr_active > 0) {
> +			mpp->retry_tick = 0;
>  			dm_queue_if_no_path(mpp->alias, 1);
> -		else if (is_queueing && mpp->retry_tick == 0)
> +		} else if (is_queueing && mpp->retry_tick == 0)
>  			enter_recovery_mode(mpp);
>  		break;
>  	}

Please explain why it's sufficient to do this in the "default" case
only. Before 0f850db7, set_no_path_retry() reset retry_tick for any
value of no_path_retry.

Martin

-- 
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux