On 2/5/18 12:11 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I have a workload where one process sends many asynchronous write bios
> (without waiting for them) and another process sends synchronous flush
> bios. During this workload, writeback throttling throttles down to one
> outstanding bio, and this incorrect throttling causes performance
> degradation (all write bios sleep in __wbt_wait and they couldn't be sent
> in parallel).
>
> The reason for this throttling is that wbt_data_dir counts flush requests
> in the read bucket. The flush requests (that take quite a long time)
> trigger this condition repeatedly:
> if (stat[READ].min > rwb->min_lat_nsec)
> and that condition causes scale down to one outstanding request, despite
> the fact that there are no read bios at all.
>
> A similar problem could also show up with REQ_OP_ZONE_REPORT and
> REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET - they are also counted in the read bucket.
>
> This patch fixes the function wbt_data_dir, so that only REQ_OP_READ
> requests are counted in the read bucket. The patch improves SATA
> write+flush throughput from 130MB/s to 350MB/s.
Good catch. But I do wonder if we should account them at all. It
might make sense to account flushes as writes, but we really
should not account anything that isn't regular read/write IO
related.
Something like the below? Potentially including REQ_OP_FLUSH in the
write latencies as well.
diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index ae8de9780085..55671e5f3b6e 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -697,7 +697,13 @@ u64 wbt_default_latency_nsec(struct request_queue *q)
static int wbt_data_dir(const struct request *rq)
{
- return rq_data_dir(rq);
+ if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_READ)
+ return READ;
+ else if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_WRITE)
+ return WRITE;
+
+ /* don't account */
+ return -1;
}
int wbt_init(struct request_queue *q)
--
Jens Axboe
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
