On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:13:53PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 11:50 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > The issue you say it was originally intended to fix _should_ be > > addressed with this change: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.16&id=4dd6edd23e7ea971efddc303f9e67eb79e95808e > > Hello Mike, > > Sorry but I'm not convinced that that patch is sufficient. That patch helps > if .end_io() is called with status BLK_STS_RESOURCE and also if > blk_insert_cloned_request() returns the .queue_rq() return value. It does not > help if .queue_rq() returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE and that return value gets > ignored. The return value from .queue_rq() is handled by blk-mq, why do you think it can be ignored? Please see blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(). > I think that can happen as follows: > - Request cloning in multipath_clone_and_map() succeeds and that function > returns DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED. > - dm_dispatch_clone_request() calls blk_insert_cloned_request(). > - blk_insert_cloned_request() calls blk_mq_request_direct_issue(), which > results in a call of __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(). > - __blk_mq_try_issue_directly() calls blk_mq_sched_insert_request(). In this This only happens iff queue is stopped or quiesced, then we return BLK_STS_OK to blk-mq via .queue_rq(), please see __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(), how does this cause IO hang? > case the BLK_STS_RESOURCE returned by the .queue_rq() implementation of the > underlying path will be ignored. No, this case won't return BLK_STS_RESOURCE. -- Ming -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
