On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:09:00PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 12:08 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > These configuration options do essentially the same thing as the > > marginal paths options do, but since they don't do the increased IO > > testing, they are less likely to find the marginal paths. Guan, if > > you > > left these in for a reason (such as to deal with devices that don't > > do > > well with IO testing, such as passive paths) I'm open to keeping > > them. > > But it seems like the marginal paths options options do a better job > > than they do, and if there are cases that they doesn't handle well, > > they > > should be expanded to do so. > > I think we should wait a bit more before removing this stuff. The > marginal paths code hasn't seen much testing yet AFAICS. That's fine. There's no rush to remove them. -Ben > > Regards > Martin > > -- > Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107 > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
