On Fri, Jan 12 2018 at 12:26pm -0500, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 12:18 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > This is going upstream for 4.16: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/snitzer/linux.git/commit/?h=dm-4.16&id=5b18cff4baedde77e0d69bd62a13ae78f9488d89 > > That is really gross. I have explained many times in detail on the dm-devel > list why that blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() call is necessary. So I think it is > wrong if you remove it. Isn't the responsibility of you as the device mapper > kernel maintainer to avoid regressions instead of introducing regressions? Please stop, seriously. You've not explained it many times. We cannot get a straight answer from you. No analysis that establishes that if an underlying dm-mq multipath path is out of tags (shared or otherwise) that dm-rq core _must_ run the hw queue after a delay. Commit 6077c2d7060 just papers over a real blk-mq problem (that may now be fixed). Your assertions that blk-mq would need to otherwise poll (and waste resources so it can immediately retry) ignores that blk-mq _should_ make progress as requests complete or if/when a path is recovered, etc. So I'm not going to accept your dysfuctional reasoning on this, sorry. _THAT_ is my job as a maintainer. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
