Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:32:42 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "axboe@xxxxxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, "tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx" <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx" <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hch@xxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20180111192027.GA31104@redhat.com>
References: <20180111021256.37490-1-snitzer@redhat.com> <20180111021256.37490-3-snitzer@redhat.com> <804df5df-2598-df69-757d-85df18185d4c@suse.de> <20180111170430.GA30621@redhat.com> <1515691112.2752.21.camel@wdc.com> <20180111172943.GA30762@redhat.com> <1515692836.2752.42.camel@wdc.com> <20180111192027.GA31104@redhat.com>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Wdcipoutbound: EOP-TRUE

On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 14:20 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Yes, I noticed the use of sysfs_lock also.  I've fixed it up earlier in
> my v4 patchset and build on it.  I'll add your Reported-by too.

Hello Mike,

There are many more inconsistencies with regard to queue flag manipulation
in the block layer core and in block drivers. I'm working on a series to
address all inconsistencies in the block layer and in the sd driver.

Bart.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Mike Snitzer

References:
- [for-4.16 PATCH v3 0/3] block/dm: allow DM to defer blk_register_queue() until ready
  - From: Mike Snitzer
- [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Mike Snitzer
- Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Hannes Reinecke
- Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Mike Snitzer
- Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Mike Snitzer
- Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
  - From: Mike Snitzer

Prev by Date: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
Next by Date: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
Previous by thread: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
Next by thread: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]