Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v2 1/3] block: only bdi_unregister() in del_gendisk() if !GENHD_FL_HIDDEN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v2 1/3] block: only bdi_unregister() in del_gendisk() if !GENHD_FL_HIDDEN
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:31:17 +0100
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180110024104.34885-2-snitzer@redhat.com>
References: <20180110024104.34885-1-snitzer@redhat.com> <20180110024104.34885-2-snitzer@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

It's in fact completely harmless :)  But not even calling it
obviously is just as fine.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

References:
- [for-4.16 PATCH v2 0/3] block: some genhd changes
  - From: Mike Snitzer
- [for-4.16 PATCH v2 1/3] block: only bdi_unregister() in del_gendisk() if !GENHD_FL_HIDDEN
  - From: Mike Snitzer

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] nvme/dm failover unification
Next by Date: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v2 2/3] block: cope with gendisk's 'queue' being added later
Previous by thread: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v2 1/3] block: only bdi_unregister() in del_gendisk() if !GENHD_FL_HIDDEN
Next by thread: [for-4.16 PATCH v2 3/3] dm: fix awkward request_queue initialization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux