On Tue, Jan 09 2018 at 6:04pm -0500, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 17:10 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c > > index 870484eaed1f..0b0dda8e2420 100644 > > --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c > > +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c > > @@ -919,8 +919,20 @@ int blk_register_queue(struct gendisk *disk) > > ret = 0; > > unlock: > > mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock); > > + > > + /* > > + * Take an extra ref on queue which will be put on disk_release() > > + * so that it sticks around as long as @disk is there. > > + */ > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!blk_get_queue(q)); > > + > > + WARN_ON(sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, > > + &q->backing_dev_info->dev->kobj, > > + "bdi")); > > + > > return ret; > > } > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_register_queue); > > Hello Mike, > > So the sysfs_create_link() call is moved from register_disk() into > blk_register_queue() but the sysfs_remove_link() call stays in del_gendisk()? > Are you sure that you want this asymmetry? My focus was on the add_disk() side of things, due to disk->queue possibly being NULL on add. But on remove all was basically left unmodified (aside from removing the WARN_ON). I dont think the asymmetry is a big deal but I can fix it. I'll wait for more feedback before sending out a v2 though. Thanks, Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
