On Thu, Nov 23 2017 at 4:15pm -0500, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The rw-semaphore is acquired for read only on two places, none of them is > performance-critical. So, we can replace it with a mutex. Can you expand on why you'd like to avoid using a rw_semaphore? mutex being faster in the fast path? Thanks, Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
