On Thu, Jan 04 2018 at 5:26am -0500, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:29:43PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > > Instead of hiding NVMe path related errors, the NVMe driver needs to > > code an appropriate generic block status from an NVMe status. > > > > We already do this translation whether or not CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATHING is > > set, so I think it's silly NVMe native multipathing has a second status > > decoder. This just doubles the work if we need to handle any new NVMe > > status codes in the future. > > > > I have a counter-proposal below that unifies NVMe-to-block status > > translations, and combines common code for determining if an error is a > > path failure. This should work for both NVMe and DM, and DM won't need > > NVMe specifics. > > > > I can split this into a series if there's indication this is ok and > > satisfies the need. > > You'll need to update nvme_error_status to account for all errors > handled in nvme_req_needs_failover, and you will probably have to > add additional BLK_STS_* code. But if this is all that the rage was > about I'm perfectly fine with it. Glad you're fine with it. I thought you'd balk at this too. Mainly because I was unaware nvme_error_status() existed; so I thought any amount of new NVMe error translation for upper-layer consumption would be met with resistence. Keith arrived at this approach based on an exchange we had in private. I gave him context for DM multipath's need to access the code NVMe uses to determine if an NVMe-specific error is retryable or not. Explained how SCSI uses scsi_dh error handling and drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:__scsi_error_from_host_byte() to establish a "differentiated IO error", and then drivers/md/dm-mpath.c:noretry_error() consumes the resulting BLK_STS_*. Armed with this context Keith was able to take his NVMe knowledge and arrive at something you're fine with. Glad it worked out. Thanks, Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
