Re: [PATCH 2/2] dm-writecache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * The clflushopt instruction is very slow on Broadwell, so we use non-temporal
>> + * stores instead.
>> + */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +#define NT_STORE(dest, src)  asm ("movnti %1, %0" : "=m"(dest) : "r"(src))
>> +#define FLUSH_RANGE(dax, ptr, size)  do { } while (0)
>> +#define COMMIT_FLUSHED()     wmb()
>> +#else
>> +#define NT_STORE(dest, src)  ACCESS_ONCE(dest) = (src)
>> +#define FLUSH_RANGE          dax_flush
>> +#define COMMIT_FLUSHED()     do { } while (0)
>> +#endif
>
> Please go through the proper pmem APIs.

Yes, see _copy_from_iter_flushcache() and all its related apis.
Drivers shouldn't be doing anything different than what fs/dax.c is
using.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux