Looks good. Thanks for reviewing.
Reviewed-by: Guan Junxiong <guanjunxiong@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 2017/11/18 8:11, Martin Wilck wrote:
> This is not a critical error. It just means that the path in
> question will have low priority (rightly so, if it has >100s latency).
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>> ---
> libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c b/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c
> index b8c5bc7c50a4..ce5c95dd7075 100644
> --- a/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c
> +++ b/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ int getprio(struct path *pp, char *args, unsigned int timeout)
> (long long)pow(base_num, lg_avglatency));
>
> if (lg_avglatency > lg_maxavglatency) {
> - pp_pl_log(0,
> + pp_pl_log(2,
> "%s: average latency (%lld us) is outside the thresold (%lld us)",
> pp->dev, (long long)pow(base_num, lg_avglatency),
> (long long)MAX_AVG_LATENCY);
>
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
