Re: dm-integrity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/12/2017 08:36 PM, Renesanso wrote:
> I have other question: why you dont use AEAD idea from redhad for 
> dm-crypt (cryptsetup, that works, as they present), that realise AES-GCM 
> (as, example ZFS use)? Why do you want to merge dm-integrity and 
> dm-crypt? 
> https://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/talks/DevConf2017/devconf2017-aead.pdf

Sorry? You mean my own talk? That exactly describes how it is implemented now.

We use AEAD when used together with encryption (dm-crypt) but this requires
LUKS2 userspace branch and this is not something I would like to use until
it is more stable.

As said in the slides you linked, dm-integrity can operate in two modes:

 - standalone [parity only] (configured through integritysetup) and

 - in cooperation with dm-crypt [for AEAD - authenticated encryption)
  (will be configured through cryptsetup, but it is not yet in master branch)

Milan

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux