Re: [Consult]: Can the coming Huawei scsi device handler be accepted in the scsi/device_handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Christoph Hellwig
  Thanks for your reply. But I am  a little confused:

  Our Huawei scsi device handler will support ALUA. Besides , some new enhancements such as error self negotiation
on the scsi (maybe NMVe in the future) error status handling to enhance reliability.  Here are two choices:
   1) Alter the scsi_dh_alua.c directly and make a generic way to handle error status.
   2) Add a new file named scsi_dh_huawei.c which implements the ALUA feature and error negotiation feature.

   Can those two choices be accepted by linux-scsi?

On 2017/5/13 12:07, Guan Junxiong wrote:
>> Hello,Alasdair and Mike:
>>     I am going to add our vendor specific Huawei scsi device handler based on scsi_dh
>> framework into the linux/drivers/scsi/device_handler directory.
>>     Is it possible to be merged into the device handler list?
>> 
>>     I am looking forward to your reply.
>>     Best withes to you!
>> 
>Any new device must support ALUA, other device handlers are legacy only.

>And btw, the right list for this is linux-scsi.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux