Re: [PATCH 02/13] dm-mpath: Avoid that path removal can trigger an infinite loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/26/2017 08:37 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If blk_get_request() fails check whether the failure is due to
> a path being removed. If that is the case fail the path by
> triggering a call to fail_path(). This patch avoids that the
> following scenario can be encountered while removing paths:
> * CPU usage of a kworker thread jumps to 100%.
> * Removing the dm device becomes impossible.
> 
> Delay requeueing if blk_get_request() returns -EBUSY or
> -EWOULDBLOCK because in these cases immediate requeuing is
> inappropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> index 909098e18643..6d4333fdddf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> @@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static int multipath_clone_and_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct request *rq,
>  	struct pgpath *pgpath;
>  	struct block_device *bdev;
>  	struct dm_mpath_io *mpio = get_mpio(map_context);
> +	struct request_queue *q;
>  	struct request *clone;
>  
>  	/* Do we need to select a new pgpath? */
> @@ -512,13 +513,19 @@ static int multipath_clone_and_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct request *rq,
>  	mpio->nr_bytes = nr_bytes;
>  
>  	bdev = pgpath->path.dev->bdev;
> -
> -	clone = blk_get_request(bdev_get_queue(bdev),
> -			rq->cmd_flags | REQ_NOMERGE,
> -			GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> +	clone = blk_get_request(q, rq->cmd_flags | REQ_NOMERGE, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (IS_ERR(clone)) {
>  		/* EBUSY, ENODEV or EWOULDBLOCK: requeue */
> -		return r;
> +		pr_debug("blk_get_request() returned %ld%s - requeuing\n",
> +			 PTR_ERR(clone), blk_queue_dying(q) ?
> +			 " (path offline)" : "");
> +		if (blk_queue_dying(q)) {
> +			atomic_inc(&m->pg_init_in_progress);
> +			activate_path(pgpath);
> +			return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
> +		}
> +		return DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE;
>  	}
>  	clone->bio = clone->biotail = NULL;
>  	clone->rq_disk = bdev->bd_disk;
> 
At the very least this does warrant some inline comments.
Why do we call activate_path() here, seeing that the queue is dying?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux