Thanks for the information Milan. On 15/04/17 06:10 AM, Milan Broz wrote: > I think your patch is ok (if it is just plain conversion), if it is > really needed, we can switch to ahash later in follow-up patch. Sounds good to me. > p.s. > there is a lot of lists on cc, but for this patch is missing dm-devel, dmcrypt changes > need to go through Mike's tree (I added dm-devel to cc:) Oh, sorry, I thought I had included all the lists. My hope however would be to get the first patch merged and then re-send the remaining patches to their respective maintainers. So that would have happened later. It's hard to manage patches otherwise with such large distribution lists. Logan -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
