Re: [PATCH 12/23] sd: handle REQ_UNMAP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"hch@xxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

Christoph,

> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:48:55PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> >  	if (sdp->no_write_same)
>> >  		return BLKPREP_INVALID;
>> >  	if (sdkp->ws16 || sector > 0xffffffff || nr_sectors > 0xffff)
>> 
>> Users can change the provisioning mode from user space from SD_LBP_WS16 into
>> SD_LBP_WS10 so I'm not sure it's safe to skip the (sdkp->ws16 || sector >
>> 0xffffffff || nr_sectors > 0xffff) check if REQ_UNMAP is set.
>
> They can, and if the device has too many sectors that will already cause
> discard to fail,

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux