Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hi Bart,
> A quote from SBC: "An OPTIMAL UNMAP GRANULARITY field set to a
> non-zero value indicates the optimal granularity in logical blocks for
> unmap requests (e.g., an UNMAP command or a WRITE SAME (16) command
> with the UNMAP bit set to one). An unmap request with a number of
> logical blocks that is not a multiple of this value may result in
> unmap operations on fewer LBAs than requested."
Indeed. Fewer LBAs than requested may be *unmapped*. That does not imply
that they are not *written*.
> This means that just like the start and end of a discard must be
> aligned on a discard_granularity boundary, WRITE SAME commands with
> the UNMAP bit set must also respect that granularity. I think this
> means that either __blkdev_issue_zeroout() has to be modified such
> that it rejects unaligned REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES operations or that
> blk_bio_write_same_split() has to be modified such that it generates
> REQ_OP_WRITEs for the unaligned start and tail.
No, that's not correct. SBC states:
"a) if the Data-Out Buffer of the WRITE SAME command is the same as the
logical block data returned by a read operation from that LBA while
in the unmapped state, then:
1) the device server performs the actions described in table 6
[unmap]; and
2) if an unmap operation is not performed in step 1), then the device
server shall perform the specified write operation to that LBA;"
I.e. With WRITE SAME it is the responsibility of the device server to
write any LBAs described by the command that were not successfully
unmapped.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
