On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:27:02AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > Feel free to repost it, I have no problem rebasing that branch as it's > standalone for now. Ok, I'll repost what I have right now, which is on top of a merge of your block/for-4.11/next and your for-next from this morning my time. Btw, I disagred with your patch to use op_is_flush in generic_make_request_checks - given that we clear these flags just below I think using the helper obsfucates what's really going on. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
