On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 14:12 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/26/2017 02:01 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 13:54 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Your call path has blk_get_request() in it, I don't have
> > > that in my tree. Is it passing in the right mask?
> >
> > Hello Jens,
> >
> > There is only one blk_get_request() call in drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > and it looks as follows:
> >
> > clone = blk_get_request(bdev_get_queue(bdev),
> > rq->cmd_flags | REQ_NOMERGE,
> > GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> Yeah, I found it in the dm patch. Looks fine to me, since
> blk_mq_alloc_request() checks for __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM. Weird, it all
> looks fine to me. Are you sure you tested with the patch? Either that,
> or I'm smoking crack.
Hello Jens,
After I received your e-mail I noticed that there was a local
modification on the test system that was responsible for the schedule-
while-atomic complaint. Sorry for that. Anyway, I undid the merge with
the v4.10-rc5 code and repeated my test. This time the following call
stack appeared:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000005c
IP: blk_mq_sched_get_request+0x310/0x350
PGD 34bd9c067
PUD 346b37067
PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: dm_service_time ib_srp scsi_transport_srp target_core_user uio target_core_pscsi target_core_file ib_srpt target_core_iblock target_core_mod brd netconsole xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat libcrc32c nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_tcpudp tun bridge stp llc ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables af_packet ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_ucm ib_uverbs ib_umad rdma_cm configfs ib_cm iw_cm msr mlx4_ib ib_core sb_edac edac_core x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp ipmi_ssif kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul mlx4_core crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 tg3 iTCO_wdt crypto_simd dcdbas iTCO_vendor_support ptp glue_helper ipmi_si cryptd ipmi_devintf pps_core fjes devlink ipmi_msghandler pcspkr libphy tpm_tis tpm_tis_core tpm button mei_me lpc_ich wmi mei mfd_core shpchp hid_generic usbhid mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops ttm sr_mod drm cdrom ehci_pci ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common sg dm_multipath dm_mod scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua autofs4
CPU: 0 PID: 9231 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.10.0-rc4-dbg+ #1
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R430/03XKDV, BIOS 1.0.2 11/17/2014
task: ffff88034c8c3140 task.stack: ffffc90005698000
RIP: 0010:blk_mq_sched_get_request+0x310/0x350
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000569bac8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffff88034f430958 RBX: ffff88045ed2cef0 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 000000000000001f RSI: ffff8803507bdcf8 RDI: 000000000000001f
RBP: ffffc9000569bb00 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffc9000569bb18
R13: 000000000000c801 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007f65ca054700(0000) GS:ffff88046f200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000000005c CR3: 000000034b0ed000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
Call Trace:
blk_mq_alloc_request+0x5e/0xb0
blk_get_request+0x2f/0x110
multipath_clone_and_map+0xcd/0x140 [dm_multipath]
map_request+0x3c/0x290 [dm_mod]
dm_mq_queue_rq+0x77/0x100 [dm_mod]
blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x1ff/0x320
blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xa9/0xe0
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x122/0x1c0
blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x84/0x90
blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x39f/0x480
blk_flush_plug_list+0xee/0x270
blk_finish_plug+0x27/0x40
do_io_submit+0x475/0x900
SyS_io_submit+0xb/0x10
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
RIP: 0033:0x7f65e4d05787
RSP: 002b:00007f65ca051948 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000d1
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000046 RCX: 00007f65e4d05787
RDX: 00007f65a404f158 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00007f65f6bfd000
RBP: 0000000000000815 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007f65a404e3e0
R10: 00007f65a4040000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00000000000006d0
R13: 00007f65a404e930 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 0000000000000830
Code: 67 ff ff ff e9 80 fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 ba c4 fe ff 31 c9 e9 60 ff ff ff 44 89 ee 4c 89 e7 e8 c8 6d ff ff 48 89 c1 49 8b 44 24 18 <48> 63 51 5c 48 8b 80 20 01 00 00 48 8b 80 80 00 00 00 48 89 0c
RIP: blk_mq_sched_get_request+0x310/0x350 RSP: ffffc9000569bac8
CR2: 000000000000005c
(gdb) list *(blk_mq_sched_get_request+0x310)
0xffffffff8132dcf0 is in blk_mq_sched_get_request (block/blk-mq-sched.c:136).
131 rq->rq_flags |= RQF_QUEUED;
132 } else
133 rq = __blk_mq_alloc_request(data, op);
134 } else {
135 rq = __blk_mq_alloc_request(data, op);
136 data->hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] = rq;
137 }
138
139 if (rq) {
140 if (!op_is_flush(op)) {
(gdb) disas blk_mq_sched_get_request
[ ... ]
0xffffffff8132dce3 <+771>: callq 0xffffffff81324ab0 <__blk_mq_alloc_request>
0xffffffff8132dce8 <+776>: mov %rax,%rcx
0xffffffff8132dceb <+779>: mov 0x18(%r12),%rax
0xffffffff8132dcf0 <+784>: movslq 0x5c(%rcx),%rdx
[ ... ]
(gdb) print &((struct request *)0)->tag
$1 = (int *) 0x5c <irq_stack_union+92>
I think this means that rq == NULL and that a test for rq is missing after the
__blk_mq_alloc_request() call?
Bart.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
