On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 11:14 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > Are there any more comments or objections to this patch? Is this a good > start or kv[mz]alloc has to provide a way to cover GFP_NOFS users as > well in the initial version. Did Andrew Morton ever comment on this? I believe he was the primary objector in the past. Last I recollect was over a year ago: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/7/1050 -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
