On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 07:22:25AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Easier to handle those in vmalloc() itself. > > I think there were some attempts in the past but some of the code paths > are burried too deep and adding gfp_mask all the way down there seemed > like a major surgery. No need to propagate gfp_mask - the same trick XFS is doing right now can be done in vmalloc.c in a couple of places and that's it; I'll resurrect the patches and post them tomorrow after I get some sleep. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
