Re: [PATCH] libmultipath: ensure dev_loss_tmo will be update to MAX_DEV_LOSS_TMO if no_path_retry set to queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 02:36:04PM +0800, peng.liang5@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: PengLiang <peng.liang5@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If no_path_retry set to queue, we should make sure dev_loss_tmo update to MAX_DEV_LOSS_TMO.
> But, it will be limit to 600 if fast_io_fail_tmo set to off or 0 meanwhile.

Doesn't the system still limit dev_loss_tmo to 600 if fast_io_fail_tmo isn't set. Multipath
was using this limit, since the underlying system uses it.

-Ben

> 
> Signed-off-by: PengLiang <peng.liang5@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  libmultipath/discovery.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libmultipath/discovery.c b/libmultipath/discovery.c
> index aaa915c..05b0842 100644
> --- a/libmultipath/discovery.c
> +++ b/libmultipath/discovery.c
> @@ -608,7 +608,8 @@ sysfs_set_rport_tmo(struct multipath *mpp, struct path *pp)
>  				goto out;
>  			}
>  		}
> -	} else if (mpp->dev_loss > DEFAULT_DEV_LOSS_TMO) {
> +	} else if (mpp->dev_loss > DEFAULT_DEV_LOSS_TMO &&
> +		mpp->no_path_retry != NO_PATH_RETRY_QUEUE) {
>  		condlog(3, "%s: limiting dev_loss_tmo to %d, since "
>  			"fast_io_fail is not set",
>  			rport_id, DEFAULT_DEV_LOSS_TMO);
> -- 
> 2.8.1.windows.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux