Re: [PATCH 1/4] brd: handle misaligned discard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/2016 04:39 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/26/2016 02:46 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
I think the proper thing would be to move "discard_zeroes_data" flag into
the bio itself - there would be REQ_OP_DISCARD and REQ_OP_DISCARD_ZERO -
and if the device doesn't support REQ_OP_DISCARD_ZERO, it rejects the bio
and the caller is supposed to do zeroing manually.

Sorry but I don't like this proposal. I think that a much better solution
would be to pause I/O before making any changes to the discard_zeroes_data
flag.

The device mapper pauses all bios when it switches the table - but the bio
was submitted with assumption that it goes to a device withe
"discard_zeroes_data" set, then the bio is paused, device mapper table is
switched, the bio is unpaused, and now it can go to a device without
"discard_zeroes_data".

Hello Mikulas,

Sorry if I wasn't clear enough. What I meant is to wait until all outstanding requests have finished before modifying the discard_zeroes_data flag - the kind of operation that is performed by e.g. blk_mq_freeze_queue(). Modifying the discard_zeroes_data flag after a bio has been submitted and before it has completed could lead to several classes of subtle bugs. Functions like __blkdev_issue_discard() assume that the value of the discard_zeroes_data flag does not change after this function has been called and before the submitted requests completed.

Bart.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux