Usage of dm-era

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear dm-devel community,

I'm trying to get familiar with dm-era but I'm stuck.

What I'm trying to achieve is to have a dm-era device which keeps track of changed blocks on a seperate hard drive or logical volume/mapping in order to create a live backup solution.

The documentation on dm-era is very sparse. So far I found a Gentoo wiki entry, a blog entry by Rackcorp and the official kernel doc.
I tried to come up with a basic setup using a virtual machine running Ubuntu 16.04.

So far I was able to create a setup that looks like this: http://i.imgur.com/LNCPima.png
To set this up, I came up with the following script: http://pastebin.com/Y3B2m7wL
It is inspired by the setup done by Rackcorp [1]. The resulting 'lsblk' looks like this:
sdb                       8:16   0  256M  0 disk 
`-metadev-era           252:2    0  276K  0 dm   
  |-era                 252:4    0  276K  0 dm   
  `-era-access          252:5    0  276K  0 dm   
sdc                       8:32   0  256M  0 disk 
`-metadev-data          252:3    0  256M  0 dm   
  |-era                 252:4    0  276K  0 dm   
  `-metadev-data-access 252:6    0  256M  0 dm   /media/sdc-data


In comparison to Rackcorp's setup, I did the following adjustment:
  • i) mounting /dev/mapper/metadev-data (or the underlying sdc) or ii) using it as an origin device for era, seemed to be mutually exclusive
  • that's why I created an additional linear mapping called 'metadev-data-access' inspired by the 'era-access' device to be able to mount and write to the sdc device again
Basically this setup is supposed to track changed blocks on /dev/sdc and uses a mounted /dev/mapper/metadev-data-access at /media/sdc-data to access /dev/sdc on top of the dm setup.

However, when reading the era metadata via 'era_dump /dev/mapper/era-access', I only get this result:
<superblock uuid="" block_size="4096" nr_blocks="1" current_era="1">
  <era_array>
    <era block="0" era="0"/>
  </era_array>
</superblock>

Why is there only one block listed? Shouldn't that list exactly as much blocks as my 'metadev-data' device has, since it is the origin for the era target?
Or is there some basic misunderstanding in my interpretation of how dm-era is supposed to work and be used?

Please be so kind and shed some light on this!

[1] http://blog.rackcorp.com/2016/03/dm-era-device-for-backups/


Best Regards,

Markus Hentsch
Cloud&Heat Technologies

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux