----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Laurence Oberman" <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Johannes Thumshirn"
> <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 11:11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: dm-mq and end_clone_request()
>
> On 08/06/16 07:47, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> > [66814.772851] [<ffffffff8118e72f>] ? panic+0x1eb/0x233
> > [66814.800207] [<ffffffff810308f8>] oops_end+0xb8/0xd0
> > [66814.827454] [<ffffffff8106977e>] no_context+0x13e/0x3a0
> > [66814.858368] [<ffffffff811f3feb>] ? __slab_free+0x9b/0x280
> > [66814.890365] [<ffffffff81069ace>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0xee/0x1d0
> > [66814.926508] [<ffffffff81069bc4>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x14/0x20
> > [66814.959939] [<ffffffff8106a269>] __do_page_fault+0x89/0x4a0
> > [66814.992039] [<ffffffff811f3feb>] ? __slab_free+0x9b/0x280
> > [66815.023052] [<ffffffff8106a6b0>] do_page_fault+0x30/0x80
> > [66815.053368] [<ffffffff816c8b88>] page_fault+0x28/0x30
> > [66815.083196] [<ffffffff814ae4e9>] ? __scsi_remove_device+0x79/0x160
> > [66815.117444] [<ffffffff814ae5c2>] ? __scsi_remove_device+0x152/0x160
> > [66815.152051] [<ffffffff814ac790>] scsi_forget_host+0x60/0x70
> > [66815.183939] [<ffffffff814a0137>] scsi_remove_host+0x77/0x110
> > [66815.216152] [<ffffffffa0677be0>] srp_remove_work+0x90/0x200 [ib_srp]
> > [66815.253221] [<ffffffff810a2e72>] process_one_work+0x152/0x400
> > [66815.286221] [<ffffffff810a3765>] worker_thread+0x125/0x4b0
> > [66815.317313] [<ffffffff810a3640>] ? rescuer_thread+0x380/0x380
> > [66815.349770] [<ffffffff810a9298>] kthread+0xd8/0xf0
> > [66815.376082] [<ffffffff816c6b3f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> > [66815.404767] [<ffffffff810a91c0>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
>
> Hello Laurence and Johannes,
>
> Later today I will start testing the following patch:
>
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix a use-after-free in scsi_forget_host()
>
> Avoid that scsi_forget_host() can call __scsi_remove_device()
> while scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext() is freeing the same
> SCSI device.
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index e0a78f5..6cffc90 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -1890,10 +1890,11 @@ void scsi_forget_host(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> restart:
> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry(sdev, &shost->__devices, siblings) {
> - if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL)
> + if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL || scsi_device_get(sdev) < 0)
> continue;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> __scsi_remove_device(sdev);
> + scsi_device_put(sdev);
> goto restart;
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> --
> 2.9.2
>
>
>
Hello Bart, Johannes
I will test this as well.
I have lost my DDN array today (sadly:)) but I have two systems back to back again using ramdisk on the one to serve LUNS.
If I pull from https://github.com/bvanassche/linux again, and switch branch to srp-initiator-for-next, will I get all Mikes latest patches from last week + this.
I guess I can just check myself, but might as well just ask.
Thanks!!
Laurence
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
