On Tue, Jul 26 2016 at 6:51pm -0400,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 06:15 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Please try this patch to see if it fixes your issue, thanks.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > index 52baf8a..287caa7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > @@ -433,10 +433,17 @@ failed:
> > */
> > static int must_push_back(struct multipath *m)
> > {
> > - return (test_bit(MPATHF_QUEUE_IF_NO_PATH, &m->flags) ||
> > - ((test_bit(MPATHF_QUEUE_IF_NO_PATH, &m->flags) !=
> > - test_bit(MPATHF_SAVED_QUEUE_IF_NO_PATH, &m->flags)) &&
> > - dm_noflush_suspending(m->ti)));
> > + bool r;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&m->lock, flags);
> > + r = (test_bit(MPATHF_QUEUE_IF_NO_PATH, &m->flags) ||
> > + ((test_bit(MPATHF_QUEUE_IF_NO_PATH, &m->flags) !=
> > + test_bit(MPATHF_SAVED_QUEUE_IF_NO_PATH, &m->flags)) &&
> > + dm_noflush_suspending(m->ti)));
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return r;
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Thank you for having made this patch available. Unfortunately even
> with this patch applied I still see fio reporting I/O errors and the
> following text still appears in the system log immediately before the
> I/O errors are reported (due to debug statements I added in the device
> mapper; mpath 254:0 and mpathbe refer to the same dm device):
>
> Jul 26 15:40:37 ion-dev-ib-ini kernel: mpath 254:0: queue_if_no_path 0 -> 1
> Jul 26 15:40:37 ion-dev-ib-ini kernel: executing DM ioctl DEV_SUSPEND on mpathbe
> Jul 26 15:40:37 ion-dev-ib-ini kernel: mpath 254:0: queue_if_no_path 1 -> 0
This is all as expected. Only question I have: is
dm_noflush_suspending() false? -- I assume so given must_push_back() is
returning false.
I'm struggling to appreciate why must_push_back() is only true if
noflush is used. Regardless of which type, if there are no paths and
queue_if_no_path was configured (implied by current != saved) then we
shouldn't be returning -EIO back up the stack.
> BTW, I have not yet been able to determine which user space code
> triggers the DEV_SUSPEND ioctl. A condlog() call I had added just
> above dm_simplecmd_flush(DM_DEVICE_SUSPEND, mapname, 0) call in
> multipathd did not produce any output.
I need to dig into the multipath-tools userspace code more to be able to
answer. But I've cc'd Ben Marzinski explicitly to get his insight.
Curious if multipath-tools _always_ use the noflush variant of suspend?
If not then we're setting ourselves up to return -EIO when we shouldn't.
Mike
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
