On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 09:50 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at, > > > did you have raid0 in your plans? > > > > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate. > > dm-flakey would allow more xfstests test cases to run. I'd say that's > more important than linear or raid0. ;-) That's an interesting one. We can emulate badblocks by failing direct_access with -EIO, but I do not think we can emulate "drop_writes" and "corrupt_bio_byte" features with DAX... > Also, the next step in this work is to then decide how to determine on > what numa node an LBA resides. We had discussed this at a prior > plumbers conference, and I think the consensus was to use xattrs. > Toshi, do you also plan to do that work? No, it's not my plan at this point. Thanks, -Toshi -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
