Hi Germano,
no reason at all ... it just missed my attention, twice. Sorry.
This patch is now merged.
Thanks,
Christophe Varoqui
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Germano Percossi <germano.percossi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Christophe,
Is there a specific reason this silly patch is not getting
through?
It seems a no-brainer to me but probably I am missing something.
Thanks,
Germano
On 02/11/2016 07:30 PM, Germano Percossi wrote:
Within the reconfigure function, the global pointer conf is
stored in a local variable and then assigned NULL.
If load_config should fail, for any reason, we end up with
a memory leak, as soon as we leave the function, and with
the global pointer conf set to NULL, leading to a segfault
as soon as it is dereferenced.
I tested it by calling a reconfigure and making the first
allocation in load_config fail but any failure in load_config
would do.
>From a user perspective the CLI reports "fail".
If something like this should happen there are at least 2 possible
scenarios:
1) If a second immediate reconfigure succeeds, the conf now is fine but
the leak stays
2) If the previous point does not happen, any command trying to access
"conf" would fail. On my test box a "show conf" segfaulted.
The fix is simple but in case of failure at least the previous
conf is kept in memory without leaks or segfaluts
Signed-off-by: Germano Percossi <germano.percossi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
multipathd/main.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c
index 04f6d02..f83c849 100644
--- a/multipathd/main.c
+++ b/multipathd/main.c
@@ -1551,6 +1551,8 @@ reconfigure (struct vectors * vecs)
configure(vecs, 1);
free_config(old);
retval = 0;
+ } else {
+ conf = old;
}
running_state = DAEMON_RUNNING;
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
