Branch 2016-02-10-thin-dev-on-4.4
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 at 22:03 Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11 2016 at 5:41am -0500,
Joe Thornber <thornber@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:13:05PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Shouldn't get_policy()'s call to get_policy_once() resolve "mq" to be
> > "smq" if we just add this to the bottom of dm-cache-policy-smq?:
> >
> > MODULE_ALIAS("dm-cache-mq");
>
> Yes, you're right. See my fixup patch.
Hmm, not seeing what you consider to be the latest fixed up version..
(nothing that sets: MODULE_ALIAS("dm-cache-mq") in smq.c)
But I've staged this in linux-next for 4.6, see:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=8cbd0cb8cca67baa3e430fb6d636613fdc1cee1a
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
