On Sat, Feb 20 2016 at 4:42am -0500,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/20/2016 07:12 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 2:42pm -0500,
> >Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 3:37am -0500,
> >>Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 02/19/16 09:33, Nomura Junichi wrote:
> >>>>On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>>>>What is the last kernel version that your scripts have worked on?
> >>>>
> >>>>v4.4 worked fine. I'll check with v4.5-rc4 when I get a machine.
> >>>
> >>>v4.5-rc4 works fine, too.
> >>
> >>Have you been running with blk-mq?
> >>Either by setting CONFIG_DM_MQ_DEFAULT or:
> >>echo Y > /sys/module/dm_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq
> >>
> >>I'm seeing test_02_sdev_delete fail with blk-mq enabled.
> >
> >I only see failure if I stack dm-mq ontop of old non-mq scsi devices with:
> >
> >echo N > /sys/module/scsi_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq
> >echo Y > /sys/module/dm_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq
> >
> >If I use scsi-mq for the underlying devices all works fine (been testing
> >the latest dm-4.6 branch though, I'll go back and try stock 4.5-rc4 just
> >to double check).
> >
> >But this makes me think the novelty of having dm-mq support stacking on
> >non-blk-mq devices was misplaced. It is a senseless config. I'll
> >probably remove support for such stacking soon (next week).
>
> Hmm. I must admit I really, really don't like these 'once-and-for-all'
> parameter.
>
> ATM the only SCSI driver to support SCSI-mq properly are lpfc,
> virtio, and fnic. None of the other driver have been modified, and I
> suspect the performance might be less than stellar.
>
> So there will be configurations where one might want to run scsi-mq
> alongside non-mq HBAs.
dm-mq already disallows such a mix though. From dm_table_set_type():
if (use_blk_mq) {
/* verify _all_ devices in the table are blk-mq devices */
list_for_each_entry(dd, devices, list)
if (!bdev_get_queue(dd->dm_dev->bdev)->mq_ops) {
DMERR("table load rejected: not all devices"
" are blk-mq request-stackable");
return -EINVAL;
}
t->type = DM_TYPE_MQ_REQUEST_BASED;
}
But I was talking about removing support for dm-mq stacked on _all_ old
.request_fn devices.
> I would really love to see to make that more granular so that these
> configurations can run efficiently.
> I know Christoph is violently against it, but I don't really see any
> solution presenting itself at the moment.
I'm with Christoph on this. Supporting such elaborate mixing is too
fragile. Time would be much better spent converting drivers to properly
support scsi-mq and/or fixing scsi-mq to perform better.
> Maybe a good topic for LSF ...
Unlikely.. but don't let me stop you! ;)
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
