Re: dm-multipath low performance with blk-mq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 27 2016 at  6:14am -0500,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> >>I don't think this is going to help __multipath_map() without some
> >>configuration changes.  Now that we're running on already merged
> >>requests instead of bios, the m->repeat_count is almost always set to 1,
> >>so we call the path_selector every time, which means that we'll always
> >>need the write lock. Bumping up the number of IOs we send before calling
> >>the path selector again will give this patch a change to do some good
> >>here.
> >>
> >>To do that you need to set:
> >>
> >>	rr_min_io_rq <something_bigger_than_one>
> >>
> >>in the defaults section of /etc/multipath.conf and then reload the
> >>multipathd service.
> >>
> >>The patch should hopefully help in multipath_busy() regardless of the
> >>the rr_min_io_rq setting.
> >
> >This patch, while generic, is meant to help the blk-mq case.  A blk-mq
> >request_queue doesn't have an elevator so the requests will not have
> >seen merging.
> >
> >But yes, implied in the patch is the requirement to increase
> >m->repeat_count via multipathd's rr_min_io_rq (I'll backfill a proper
> >header once it is tested).
> 
> I'll test it once I get some spare time (hopefully soon...)

OK thanks.

BTW, I _cannot_ get null_blk to come even close to your reported 1500K+
IOPs on 2 "fast" systems I have access to.  Which arguments are you
loading the null_blk module with?

I've been using:
modprobe null_blk gb=4 bs=4096 nr_devices=1 queue_mode=2 submit_queues=12

On my 1 system is a 12 core single socket, single NUMA node with 12G of
memory, I can only get ~500K read IOPs and ~85K write IOPs.

On another much larger system with 72 cores and 4 NUMA nodes with 128G
of memory, I can only get ~310K read IOPs and ~175K write IOPs.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux