Re: [PATCH 02/35] block: add REQ_OP definitions and bi_op/op fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/09/2016 07:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Seems like this is missing REQ_OP_FLUSH, which still hides as a write?
> 

I might have misunderstood what you wanted or am misunderstanding you now.

I did not change the flush related code until the last patches. I added
REQ_OP_FLUSH in patch:

[PATCH 33/35] block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation
commit 18dea20363ba245a47bc1bb54f6465b8a05b19af
Author: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Jan 5 21:02:17 2016 -0600

    block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation


and I added the REQ_PREFLUSH flag in


[PATCH 35/35] block, drivers, fs: rename REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH
commit 303dc6a7cc3673065538ba041562fcd833a619af
Author: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Jan 7 18:17:03 2016 -0600

    block, drivers, fs: rename REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH


I did them in separate patches, because I was not sure if they were
correct with what you requested before, and because they were a little
more tricky because of how request_fn drivers, make_request_fn drivers,
and dm-multipath handle flushes differently.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux