Re: [PATCH 00/35 v2] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35 v2] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:32:37 -0800
Cc: linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, osd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1452027218-32303-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com>
Reply-to: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

This looks good to me from a highlevel point of view.
Do you also have a git tree to take a look at all the changes in a
single big diff?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/35 v2] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs
  - From: Mike Christie

References:
- [PATCH 00/35 v2] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs
  - From: mchristi

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] disk doesn't spin down with thin pool + dmeventd
Next by Date: Re: WANTED new maintainer for Linux/md (and mdadm)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/35 v2] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/35 v2] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]