On 12/07/2015 05:31 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: >> Great. Moving forward it'd be awesome if you could work to get your >> verity FEC support regression tests into cryptsetup's tests. > > Sure. These tests would basically involve generating a valid disk > image, corrupting it up to the theoretical maximum, and verifying that > dm-verity can correct it. Does the code handle/report even the same type of data corruption for RS blocks? Or this is just silently ignored until data area corruption happens? Sorry, I did not study the code here, I am just curious :) (IOW I mean if data are ok but recovery metadata is corrupted.) Milan -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
